Cover Image

Intraoperative assessment of reduction and implant placement in acetabular fractures - limitations of 3D-imaging compared to computed tomography

In acetabular fractures, the assessment of reduction and implant placement has limitations in conventional 2D intraoperative imaging. 3D imaging offers the opportunity to acquire CT-like images and thus to improve the results. However, clinical experience shows that even 3D imaging has limitations,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keil, Holger (Author) , Beisemann, Nils (Author) , Schnetzke, Marc (Author) , Vetter, Sven Y. (Author) , Swartman, Benedict (Author) , Grützner, Paul Alfred (Author) , Franke, Jochen (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 10 April 2018
In: Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
Year: 2018, Volume: 13
ISSN:1749-799X
DOI:10.1186/s13018-018-0780-7
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0780-7
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0780-7
Get full text
Author Notes:Holger Keil, Nils Beisemann, Marc Schnetzke, Sven Yves Vetter, Benedict Swartman, Paul Alfred Grützner and Jochen Franke
Description
Summary:In acetabular fractures, the assessment of reduction and implant placement has limitations in conventional 2D intraoperative imaging. 3D imaging offers the opportunity to acquire CT-like images and thus to improve the results. However, clinical experience shows that even 3D imaging has limitations, especially regarding artifacts when implants are placed. The purpose of this study was to assess the difference between intraoperative 3D imaging and postoperative CT regarding reduction and implant placement.
Item Description:Gesehen am 26.04.2018
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1749-799X
DOI:10.1186/s13018-018-0780-7

Similar Items