Classification of bleeding events: comparison of ECASS III (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study) and the New Heidelberg bleeding classification
Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after acute ischemic stroke treatments represents a feared complication with possible prognostic implications. In recent years, ICHs were commonly classified according to the ECASS (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study). To improve the clinical applicability and rele...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
April 28, 2017
|
| In: |
Stroke
Year: 2017, Volume: 48, Issue: 7, Pages: 1983-1985 |
| ISSN: | 1524-4628 |
| DOI: | 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016735 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016735 Verlag, Volltext: http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/48/7/1983 |
| Author Notes: | Ulf Neuberger, Markus Alfred Möhlenbruch, Christian Herweh, Christian Ulfert, Martin Bendszus, Johannes Pfaff |
| Summary: | Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after acute ischemic stroke treatments represents a feared complication with possible prognostic implications. In recent years, ICHs were commonly classified according to the ECASS (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study). To improve the clinical applicability and relevance, the new Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (HBC) has been proposed in 2015. Here, we compared the ECASS and HBC classification with regard to observed events and prognostic relevance. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 29.05.2018 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1524-4628 |
| DOI: | 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016735 |