Remarks on Segal algebras
Let B be an abstract Segal algebra in some Banach algebra A. There was some belief that in the commutative case A should be semi-simple, if B is, but this is not so (Section I). It is well known that a (proper) abstract Segal algebra does not have bounded right approximate units. It may however have...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
1975
|
| In: |
Manuscripta mathematica
Year: 1975, Volume: 16, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-9 |
| ISSN: | 1432-1785 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/BF01169059 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01169059 Verlag, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01169059 
|
| Author Notes: | Michael Leinert |
| Summary: | Let B be an abstract Segal algebra in some Banach algebra A. There was some belief that in the commutative case A should be semi-simple, if B is, but this is not so (Section I). It is well known that a (proper) abstract Segal algebra does not have bounded right approximate units. It may however have a left unit. Pseudosymmetric Segal algebras in the sense of Reiter do not have bounded left approximate units (Section II). A nonfactorization proof is given for a class of algebras which contains most of the known examples of Segal algebras on abelian groups (Section III). |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 04.06.2018 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1432-1785 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/BF01169059 |