Neue SEPSIS-3-Definition: Müssen wir Sepsis in Zukunft behandeln, bevor wir sie diagnostizieren dürfen? = New Sepsis-3 definition: Do we have to treat sepsis before we can diagnose it from now on?

The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) have been available since the beginning of 2016. SEPSIS-3 completely replaces the old SIRS criteria in the definition of sepsis and defines sepsis from now on as “life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schmoch, Thomas (Author) , Uhle, Florian (Author) , Brenner, Thorsten (Author) , Weigand, Markus A. (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:German
English
Published: 2017
In: Der Anaesthesist
Year: 2017, Volume: 66, Issue: 8, Pages: 614-621
ISSN:1432-055X
DOI:10.1007/s00101-017-0316-2
Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-017-0316-2
Verlag, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00101-017-0316-2
Get full text
Author Notes:T. Schmoch, M. Bernhard, F. Uhle, M. Gründling, T. Brenner, M.A. Weigand
Description
Summary:The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) have been available since the beginning of 2016. SEPSIS-3 completely replaces the old SIRS criteria in the definition of sepsis and defines sepsis from now on as “life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection”. However, it seems questionable whether in clinical practice the new definition is really superior to the old one. The most important question is the following: Is it helpful to have a definition that first recognizes a patient once organ dysfunction has occurred and the patient already needs intensive care?
Item Description:First online: 11 May 2017
Gesehen am 15.06.2018
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1432-055X
DOI:10.1007/s00101-017-0316-2