Post-prostatectomy radiotherapy adversely affects urinary continence irrespective of radiotherapy regime

To investigate the influence of different postoperative radiotherapy (RT) regimes on post-prostatectomy continence and QoL.MethodsMen after prostatectomy (RP) and RT were assigned in adjuvant (ART), early salvage (ESRT) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) groups depending on time of initiation, indicatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne (VerfasserIn) , Steimer, Johannes (VerfasserIn) , Bruckner, Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Jakobi, Hildegard (VerfasserIn) , Körber, Stefan A. (VerfasserIn) , Debus, Jürgen (VerfasserIn) , Hohenfellner, Markus (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2017
In: World journal of urology
Year: 2017, Jahrgang: 35, Heft: 12, Pages: 1841-1847
ISSN:1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-017-2081-x
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2081-x
Verlag, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00345-017-2081-x
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:J. N. Nyarangi-Dix, J. Steimer, T. Bruckner, H. Jakobi, S.A. Koerber, B. Hadaschik, J. Debus, M. Hohenfellner
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate the influence of different postoperative radiotherapy (RT) regimes on post-prostatectomy continence and QoL.MethodsMen after prostatectomy (RP) and RT were assigned in adjuvant (ART), early salvage (ESRT) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) groups depending on time of initiation, indication and pre-RT-PSA (≤/>0.5 ng/ml). Continence and QoL outcomes were evaluated by validated questionnaire. Statistical analysis included students t test, Chi square, Fisher’s test, ROC- and McNemar-Bowker-Analyses.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 5.1 years. 33.5, 38.2 and 28.3% received ART, ESRT and SRT, respectively. Mean time to RT was 0.3 (±0.4), 1.8 (±2.5) and 3.3 (±3.6) years respectively. Differences in age at RP (p = 0.54) and RT (p = 0.47) between groups were not significant. Mean-RT-dose was similar (p = 0.70). Differences in continence distribution between groups before (p = 0.56) and after RT (p = 0.38) were not significant. No significant differences were observed for frequency (p = 0.58) or amount (p = 0.88) of urine loss, impact on QoL (p = 0.13) and ICIQ-SF scores (p = 0.69) between groups. Even though no significant difference in post-RT-continence (p = 0.89) was observed in the direct comparison between groups, a significant worsening of long-term continence was observed in all groups (p < 0.001). We found no cutoff and no time-point after RP at which this negative effect of RT on continence became insignificant (AUC = 0.474). A subgroup with apparent local recurrence showed no differences for ICIQ-SF-score (p = 0.155), QoL (0.077), incontinence grade (p = 0.387), frequency (p = 0.182) and amount (p = 0.415) of urine loss. Proportionally more men in this subgroup remembered deterioration of continence after RT (p = 0.029).ConclusionPostoperative RT adversely affects long-term continence; this negative effect is irrespective of time of initiation or indication for RT. These results suggest a need for innovative strategies of prostate cancer therapy with lasting oncological, functional and QoL outcomes.
Beschreibung:Published online: 31 August 2017
Gesehen am 26.06.2018
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-017-2081-x