Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and the usability of an electromagnetic tracking device in maxillo-facial surgery through testing on a phantom skull under operating room (OR) conditions. Material and methods. A standard plastic skull phantom was equipped with a custom made model of the maxilla and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seeberger, Robin (Author) , Kane, Gavin J. (Author) , Hoffmann, Jürgen (Author) , Eggers, Georg (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2012
In: Journal of cranio-maxillofacial surgery
Year: 2011, Volume: 40, Issue: 2, Pages: 156-161
ISSN:1878-4119
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2011.03.003
Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2011.03.003
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518211000461
Get full text
Author Notes:Robin Seeberger, Gavin Kane, Juergen Hoffmann, Georg Eggers
Description
Summary:Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and the usability of an electromagnetic tracking device in maxillo-facial surgery through testing on a phantom skull under operating room (OR) conditions. Material and methods. A standard plastic skull phantom was equipped with a custom made model of the maxilla and with target markers and dental brackets. Imaging was performed with a computed tomography (CT) scanner. The extent and robustness of the electromagnetic tracking system’s target registration error (TRE) was evaluated under various conditions. Results: For each measurement a total of 243 registrations were performed with 5 point registration and 4374 registrations with 6 point registration. The average target registration error for the 5 point registration under OR conditions was 2.1mm (SD 0.86) and 1.03 (SD 0.53) for the 6 point registration. Metallic instruments applied to the skull increased the TRE significantly in both registration methods. Conclusion: The electromagnetic tracking device showed a high accuracy and performed stable in both registration methods. Electromagnetic interference due to metallic instruments was significant but the extent of TRE was still acceptable in comparison to optical navigation devices. A benefit of EM tracking is the absence of line-of-sight hindrance. The test setting simulating OR conditions has proven suitable for further studies.
Item Description:Published online: 1 April 2011
Gesehen am 27.06.2018
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1878-4119
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2011.03.003