Graph-based matching of points-of-interest from collaborative geo-datasets

Several geospatial studies and applications require comprehensive semantic information from points-of-interest (POIs). However, this information is frequently dispersed across different collaborative mapping platforms. Surprisingly, there is still a research gap on the conflation of POIs from this t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Novack, Tessio (Author) , Peters, Robin (Author) , Zipf, Alexander (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 15 March 2018
In: ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Year: 2018, Volume: 7, Issue: 3
ISSN:2220-9964
DOI:10.3390/ijgi7030117
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7030117
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/7/3/117
Get full text
Author Notes:Tessio Novack, Robin Peters and Alexander Zipf
Description
Summary:Several geospatial studies and applications require comprehensive semantic information from points-of-interest (POIs). However, this information is frequently dispersed across different collaborative mapping platforms. Surprisingly, there is still a research gap on the conflation of POIs from this type of geo-dataset. In this paper, we focus on the matching aspect of POI data conflation by proposing two matching strategies based on a graph whose nodes represent POIs and edges represent matching possibilities. We demonstrate how the graph is used for (1) dynamically defining the weights of the different POI similarity measures we consider; (2) tackling the issue that POIs should be left unmatched when they do not have a corresponding POI on the other dataset and (3) detecting multiple POIs from the same place in the same dataset and jointly matching these to the corresponding POI(s) from the other dataset. The strategies we propose do not require the collection of training samples or extensive parameter tuning. They were statistically compared with a “naive”, though commonly applied, matching approach considering POIs collected from OpenStreetMap and Foursquare from the city of London (England). In our experiments, we sequentially included each of our methodological suggestions in the matching procedure and each of them led to an increase in the accuracy in comparison to the previous results. Our best matching result achieved an overall accuracy of 91%, which is more than 10% higher than the accuracy achieved by the baseline method.
Item Description:Gesehen am 13.07.2018
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2220-9964
DOI:10.3390/ijgi7030117