Planar versus triptycenylene end-capped aroyleneimidazoles as electron acceptors in organic photovoltaics

The effect of triptycenylene end-groups on the optoelectronic properties of aroyleneimidazoles and their performance as acceptors in bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices are described. We compare three derivatives of triptycene monoaroyleneimidazoles with their planar analogues. Planar aroylenei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Menke, Elisabeth H. (VerfasserIn) , Leibold, David (VerfasserIn) , Galow, Alexander P. (VerfasserIn) , Vaynzof, Yana (VerfasserIn) , Mastalerz, Michael (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 04 Apr 2017
In: Organic chemistry frontiers
Year: 2017, Jahrgang: 4, Heft: 5, Pages: 834-838
ISSN:2052-4129
DOI:10.1039/C7QO00231A
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7QO00231A
Verlag, Volltext: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2017/qo/c7qo00231a
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Elisabeth H. Menke, David Leibold, Alexander P. Ullrich, Yana Vaynzof and Michael Mastalerz
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The effect of triptycenylene end-groups on the optoelectronic properties of aroyleneimidazoles and their performance as acceptors in bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices are described. We compare three derivatives of triptycene monoaroyleneimidazoles with their planar analogues. Planar aroyleneimidazoles show rather poor performance as acceptors with power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of ∼0.3-1.3%. In contrast, the triptycene end-capped congeners show improved performance with a maximum PCE of 2.3%, demonstrating the potential of triptycene-based π-systems for application as non-fullerene electron acceptors.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 26.09.2018
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:2052-4129
DOI:10.1039/C7QO00231A