Cover Image

Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583]

The optimal strategy for abdominal wall closure has been an issue of ongoing debate. Available studies do not specifically enroll patients who undergo emergency laparotomy and thus do not consider the distinct biological characteristics of these patients. The present randomized controlled trial eval...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rahbari, Nuh Nabi (Author) , Knebel, Phillip (Author) , Kieser, Meinhard (Author) , Bruckner, Thomas (Author) , Diener, Markus K. (Author) , Voß, Sabine (Author) , Rossion, Inga (Author) , Büchler, Markus W. (Author) , Seiler, Christoph (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 30 May 2012
In: Trials
Year: 2012, Volume: 13
ISSN:1468-6694
DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-72
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-72
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-72
Get full text
Author Notes:Nuh N. Rahbari, Phillip Knebel, Meinhard Kieser, Thomas Bruckner, Detlef K. Bartsch, Helmut Friess, Andre L. Mihaljevic, Josef Stern, Markus K. Diener, Sabine Voss, Inga Rossion, Markus W. Büchler and Christoph M. Seiler
Description
Summary:The optimal strategy for abdominal wall closure has been an issue of ongoing debate. Available studies do not specifically enroll patients who undergo emergency laparotomy and thus do not consider the distinct biological characteristics of these patients. The present randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary emergency midline laparotomy.
Item Description:Gesehen am 22.11.2018
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1468-6694
DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-72

Similar Items