Long-term follow-up of five yr shows superior renal function with everolimus plus early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in the PROTECT randomized liver transplantation study

BACKGROUND: The 12-month (M) PROTECT study showed that de novo liver transplant recipients (LTxR) who switched from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression to a CNI-free everolimus (EVR)-based regimen showed numerically better renal function. Here, we present the five-yr follow-up data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Sterneck, Martina (VerfasserIn) , Schemmer, Peter (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2016 May 10
In: Clinical transplantation
Year: 2016, Jahrgang: 30, Heft: 6, Pages: 741-748
ISSN:1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/ctr.12744
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12744
Verlag, Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ctr.12744
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Martina Sterneck, Gernot M. Kaiser, Nils Heyne, Nicolas Richter, Falk Rauchfuss, Andreas Pascher, Peter Schemmer, Lutz Fischer, Christian G. Klein, Silvio Nadalin, Frank Lehner, Utz Settmacher, Daniel Gotthardt, Martin Loss, Stephan Ladenburger, Peter Wimmer, Markus Dworak and Hans J. Schlitt
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: The 12-month (M) PROTECT study showed that de novo liver transplant recipients (LTxR) who switched from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression to a CNI-free everolimus (EVR)-based regimen showed numerically better renal function. Here, we present the five-yr follow-up data. METHODS: PROTECT was a randomized controlled study in which LTxR received basiliximab and CNI-based immunosuppression ± corticosteroids. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive EVR or continue CNI. Patients completing the core study could enter the extension study on their randomized treatment. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients entered the extension study (41, EVR; 40, CNI). At M59 post-randomization, the adjusted mean eGFR was significantly higher in the EVR group, with a benefit of 12.4 mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault (95% CI: 1.2; 23.6; p = 0.0301). Also, there was a significant benefit for adjusted and unadjusted eGFR using the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD4) or Nankivell formula. During the extension period, treatment failure rates were similar. SAEs occurred in 26 (63.4%) and 28 (70.0%) of the patients in EVR and CNI groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with the CNI-based treatment, EVR-based CNI-free immunosuppression resulted in significantly better renal function and comparable patient and graft outcomes after five-yr follow-up.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 04.03.2019
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/ctr.12744