Evidence-based quality standards improve prognosis in colon cancer care

Background - Colon cancer requires interdisciplinary care with quality of initial surgical treatment being a major prognostic factor. Implementation of quality standards based on structural and procedural indicators in routine care via certification (Germany) or accreditation (USA) is an established...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trautmann, Freya (Author) , Weitz, Jürgen (Author) , Schmitt, Jochen Maximilian (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 17 May 2018
In: European journal of surgical oncology
Year: 2018, Volume: 44, Issue: 9, Pages: 1324-1330
ISSN:1532-2157
DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.013
Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.013
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798318310679
Get full text
Author Notes:Freya Trautmann, Christoph Reißfelder, Mathieu Pecqueux, Jürgen Weitz, Jochen Schmitt
Description
Summary:Background - Colon cancer requires interdisciplinary care with quality of initial surgical treatment being a major prognostic factor. Implementation of quality standards based on structural and procedural indicators in routine care via certification (Germany) or accreditation (USA) is an established quality assurance method. However, evidence on effects is scarce. We undertook a population-based cohort study to investigate the effectiveness of colon cancer care in certified vs non-certified hospitals. - Materials and methods - We utilized data of a large statutory health insurance including in- and outpatient data from 2005 to 2015 of >2 million individuals from Saxony, Germany. Case definitions were based on diagnosis, medical procedures and prescriptions. Patients treated in certified hospitals (CH) were compared to patients treated in non-certified hospitals (NCH) using logistic and Cox regression models adjusting for relevant confounders concerning overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), 30-day mortality, recurrence, complications and second resections within 6 months after first resection (SR). - Results - Overall, 6186 patients with incident colon cancer undergoing surgery were identified (mean age 74.1 ± 11.0 years, 51.1% male) with 2120 (34.3%) patients treated in a CH. Confounder-adjusted regression models indicated positive effects in CH on OS (HR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.83-0.97), DSS (HR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.57-0.88), 30-day mortality (OR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.55-0.87) and SR (OR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.30-0.87). These results remained stable after adjustment for hospital volume. 30-day mortality in 2014 was 41% lower in CH (7.4%) compared to NCH (12.6%). - Conclusions - This study indicates that the implementation and assurance of evidence-based quality standards has substantial positive effects on various patient-relevant outcomes in colon cancer care.
Item Description:Gesehen am 16.05.2019
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1532-2157
DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.013