Comparison of nutritional screening parameters in oncology patients with malnutrition: handgrip strength as a reliable parameter

Aim: To evaluate handgrip strength (HGS), phase angle (PA), serum albumin, nutritional risk screening (NRS) and quality of life (QoL) as markers for nutritional status and prognostic factors for survival in oncology patients with malnutrition and parenteral nutritional therapy. Methods: We conducte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Galata, Christian (Author) , Hetjens, Svetlana (Author) , Seyfried, Steffen (Author) , Vassilev, Georgi (Author) , Otto, Mirko (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: Mar 4, 2019
In: Progress in nutrition
Year: 2019, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Pages: 141-148
DOI:10.23751/pn.v21i1.7561
Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.23751/pn.v21i1.7561
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/progressinnutrition/article/view/7561
Get full text
Author Notes:Christian Galata, Jan Arensmeyer, Svetlana Hetjens, Steffen Seyfried, Georgi Vassilev, Mirko Otto
Description
Summary:Aim: To evaluate handgrip strength (HGS), phase angle (PA), serum albumin, nutritional risk screening (NRS) and quality of life (QoL) as markers for nutritional status and prognostic factors for survival in oncology patients with malnutrition and parenteral nutritional therapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective study with 36 patients between August 2013 and November 2015. HGS was measured using a hydraulic dynamometer, PA was calculated based on bioelectrical impedance tests. Serum albumin levels were measured and a nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002) was performed. The Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire was used to assess QoL. PA was regarded as the gold standard for determining body composition and nutritional status. A 1-year follow-up was performed, and patient survival was evaluated. Results: HGS showed a significant correlation with PA in bioelectrical impedance analysis. Body mass index (BMI) was not correlated with HGS. Albumin and NRS showed poor specificity as compared to PA. QoL was not correlated with parameters for nutritional status. Overall survival was poor with a 1-year survival rate of 15%. Conclusions: Compared to serum albumin and BMI, HGS is a reliable tool for the assessment of nutritional status in oncology patients. When indication for parenteral nutrition is confirmed in cancer patients with malnutrition, overall patient survival is poor.
Item Description:Gesehen am 31.05.2019
Physical Description:Online Resource
DOI:10.23751/pn.v21i1.7561