Serving many masters: public accountability in private policy implementation

In recent decades, the introduction of market principles has transformed public service delivery into a hybrid. However, little is known about how these changes are reflected in the attitudes of private implementing agents: The hybridization literature neglects individuals, and street-level bureaucr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Thomann, Eva (VerfasserIn) , Hupe, P. L. (VerfasserIn) , Sager, Fritz (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2018
In: Governance
Year: 2017, Jahrgang: 31, Heft: 2, Pages: 299-319
ISSN:1468-0491
DOI:10.1111/gove.12297
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12297
Verlag, Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gove.12297
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Eva Thomann, Peter Hupe, Fritz Sager
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In recent decades, the introduction of market principles has transformed public service delivery into a hybrid. However, little is known about how these changes are reflected in the attitudes of private implementing agents: The hybridization literature neglects individuals, and street-level bureaucracy research has disregarded hybridization. This article extends Hupe and Hill's () accountability regimes framework to introduce the market as an additional accountability regime alongside state, profession, and society. Using a configurational approach, the article explores how public and private food safety inspectors in Switzerland perceive the multiple norms for behavior stemming from their environment. Results suggest that the plural accountabilities of for-profit street-level bureaucrats can increase the dilemmas involved in their work. Under certain circumstances, for-profit street-level bureaucrats have particular difficulties reconciling rule pressure with market incentives and client demands. The extended accountability regimes framework fruitfully captures such dilemmas and helps identify suitable governance responses.
Beschreibung:First published: 06 June 2017
Gesehen am 06.08.2019
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1468-0491
DOI:10.1111/gove.12297