Comparison of raman and mid-infrared spectroscopy for real-time monitoring of yeast fermentations: a proof-of-concept for multi-channel photometric sensors

Raman and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy are useful tools for the specific detection of molecules, since both methods are based on the excitation of fundamental vibration modes. In this study, Raman and MIR spectroscopy were applied simultaneously during aerobic yeast fermentations of Saccharomyces...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schalk, Robert (Author) , Heintz, Annabell (Author) , Braun, Frank (Author) , Iacono, Giuseppe (Author) , Rädle, Matthias (Author) , Gretz, Norbert (Author) , Methner, Frank-Jürgen (Author) , Beuermann, Thomas (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 17 June 2019
In: Applied Sciences
Year: 2019, Volume: 9, Issue: 12
ISSN:2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app9122472
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122472
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/12/2472
Get full text
Author Notes:Robert Schalk, Annabell Heintz, Frank Braun, Giuseppe Iacono, Matthias Raedle, Norbert Gretz, Frank-Juergen Methner and Thomas Beuermann
Description
Summary:Raman and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy are useful tools for the specific detection of molecules, since both methods are based on the excitation of fundamental vibration modes. In this study, Raman and MIR spectroscopy were applied simultaneously during aerobic yeast fermentations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Based on the recorded Raman intensities and MIR absorption spectra, respectively, temporal concentration courses of glucose, ethanol, and biomass were determined. The chemometric methods used to evaluate the analyte concentrations were partial least squares (PLS) regression and multiple linear regression (MLR). In view of potential photometric sensors, MLR models based on two (2D) and four (4D) analyte-specific optical channels were developed. All chemometric models were tested to predict glucose concentrations between 0 and 30 g L-1, ethanol concentrations between 0 and 10 g L-1, and biomass concentrations up to 15 g L-1 in real time during diauxic growth. Root-mean-squared errors of prediction (RMSEP) of 0.68 g L-1, 0.48 g L-1, and 0.37 g L-1 for glucose, ethanol, and biomass were achieved using the MIR setup combined with a PLS model. In the case of Raman spectroscopy, the corresponding RMSEP values were 0.92 g L-1, 0.39 g L-1, and 0.29 g L-1. Nevertheless, the simple 4D MLR models could reach the performance of the more complex PLS evaluation. Consequently, the replacement of spectrometer setups by four-channel sensors were discussed. Moreover, the advantages and disadvantages of Raman and MIR setups are demonstrated with regard to process implementation.
Item Description:Gesehen am 11.09.2019
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app9122472