Corporate crime, the lawmaker's options for corporate criminal laws and Luhmann's concept of "useful illegality"

The article contributes to the current discussion on whether and how to introduce corporate criminal responsibility to Germany. The article focuses on the interrelation between possible designs of a future corporate criminal law and the explanatory model of the "early" Niklas Luhmann (1964...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schröder, Thomas (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 16 February 2019
In: International journal of law, crime and justice
Year: 2019, Volume: 57, Pages: 13-25
ISSN:1756-0616
DOI:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.01.004
Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.01.004
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061618302271
Get full text
Author Notes:Thomas Schröder
Description
Summary:The article contributes to the current discussion on whether and how to introduce corporate criminal responsibility to Germany. The article focuses on the interrelation between possible designs of a future corporate criminal law and the explanatory model of the "early" Niklas Luhmann (1964) on the existence and functionality of "useful illegality" ("brauchbare Illegalität") in organisations. The author presents the alternatives for penal legislature, discusses the original concept of Luhmann and debates his recent "rediscovery" and popularisation in the context of publicly debated corporate misconduct. The key question is whether, for reasons of efficiency, the law should allow companies leeway for useful deviant behaviour. As a rule, severe violations of state law are neither desirable nor useful. However, the "uselessness" depends on the "accounting period". Rather, the author takes the view that law itself endeavours as far as possible to systematically implement socially beneficial behaviour in the binary code "right-wrong".
Item Description:Received 15 June 2018; Received in revised form 14 December 2018; Accepted 21 January 2019; Available online 16 February 2019
Gesehen am 25.09.2019
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1756-0616
DOI:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.01.004