Evaluating the effects of receive-only arrays in specific absorption rate simulations at 3 and 7T

Specific absorption rate (SAR) simulations are performed for most clinical and research transmit coil configurations. Such simulations allow the determination of limits in transmit power for patient safety. Different human models and coil configurations have been previously investigated using these...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malzacher, Matthias (Author) , Davids, Mathias (Author) , Schad, Lothar R. (Author) , Chacón-Caldera, Jorge (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: [November 2018]
In: Magnetic resonance imaging
Year: 2018, Volume: 53, Pages: 7-13
ISSN:1873-5894
DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2018.06.011
Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2018.06.011
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X18302327
Get full text
Author Notes:Matthias Malzacher, Mathias Davids, Lothar R. Schad, Jorge Chacon-Caldera
Description
Summary:Specific absorption rate (SAR) simulations are performed for most clinical and research transmit coil configurations. Such simulations allow the determination of limits in transmit power for patient safety. Different human models and coil configurations have been previously investigated using these simulations. However, only a few works have accounted for the effect of the receive (Rx) arrays in the SAR calculations and they have used very specialized setups or simplified detuning modeling of the Rx elements. In this work, we performed electromagnetic simulations using a clinical alike setup for whole-body scans at 3T and head scans at 7T. SAR simulations are performed for both setups with and without Rx arrays. A difference below 10% percent was found for max SAR. The maximum difference for the mean SAR values of the 3T setups remained within 8% and within 15% of the 7T setup.
Item Description:Available online 26 June 2018
Gesehen am 10.10.2019
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1873-5894
DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2018.06.011