Ivor Lewis esophagectomy patients are particularly vulnerable to respiratory impairment - a comparison to major lung resection

Pulmonary complications and a poor clinical outcome are common in response to transthoracic esophagectomy, but their etiology is not well understood. Clinical observation suggests that patients undergoing pulmonary resection, a surgical intervention with similarities to the thoracic part of esophage...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reichert, Martin (Author) , Schistek, Magdalena (Author) , Uhle, Florian (Author) , Koch, Christian (Author) , Bodner, Johannes (Author) , Hecker, Matthias (Author) , Hörbelt, Rüdiger (Author) , Grau, Veronika (Author) , Padberg, Winfried (Author) , Weigand, Markus A. (Author) , Hecker, Andreas (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 14 August 2019
In: Scientific reports
Year: 2019, Volume: 9, Pages: 1-12
ISSN:2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-48234-w
Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48234-w
Verlag: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-48234-w
Get full text
Author Notes:Martin Reichert, Magdalena Schistek, Florian Uhle, Christian Koch, Johannes Bodner, Matthias Hecker, Rüdiger Hörbelt, Veronika Grau, Winfried Padberg, Markus A. Weigand & Andreas Hecker
Description
Summary:Pulmonary complications and a poor clinical outcome are common in response to transthoracic esophagectomy, but their etiology is not well understood. Clinical observation suggests that patients undergoing pulmonary resection, a surgical intervention with similarities to the thoracic part of esophagectomy, fare much better, but this has not been investigated in detail. A retrospective single-center analysis of 181 consecutive patients after right-sided thoracotomy for either Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (n = 83) or major pulmonary resection (n = 98) was performed. An oxygenation index <300 mm Hg was used to indicate respiratory impairment. When starting surgery, respiratory impairment was seen more frequently in patients undergoing major pulmonary resection compared to esophagectomy patients (p = 0.009). On postoperative days one to ten, however, esophagectomy caused higher rates of respiratory impairment (p < 0.05) resulting in a higher cumulative incidence of postoperative respiratory impairment for patients after esophagectomy (p < 0.001). Accordingly, esophagectomy patients were characterized by longer ventilation times (p < 0.0001), intensive care unit and total postoperative hospital stays (both p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the postoperative clinical course including respiratory impairment after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is significantly worse than that after major pulmonary resection. A detailed investigation of the underlying causes is required to improve the outcome of esophagectomy.
Item Description:Gesehen am 06.12.2019
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-48234-w