Tuberculosis test results using fresh versus biobanked urine samples with FujiLAM

We agree with John T Connelly and colleagues1 that assessment of analyte stability - and matrix effects must be part of every assay validation. It is, however, essential - that validation is done with the assay under consideration, as different lipoarabinomannan - (LAM) assays use different reagents...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Broger, Tobias (Author) , Muyoyeta, Monde (Author) , Kerkhoff, Andrew D. (Author) , Denkinger, Claudia M. (Author) , Moreau, Emmanuel (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: January 01, 2020
In: The lancet. Infectious diseases
Year: 2020, Volume: 20, Issue: 1, Pages: 22-23
ISSN:1474-4457
DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30684-X
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30684-X
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(19)30684-X/abstract
Get full text
Author Notes:Tobias Broger, Monde Muyoyeta, Andrew D. Kerkhoff, Claudia M. Denkinger, Emmanuel Moreau
Description
Summary:We agree with John T Connelly and colleagues1 that assessment of analyte stability - and matrix effects must be part of every assay validation. It is, however, essential - that validation is done with the assay under consideration, as different lipoarabinomannan - (LAM) assays use different reagents that bind to different LAM epitopes with different - stabilities or availabilities. Therefore, results from the research assay described - by Connelly and colleagues,1 showing rapid signal loss, are not generalisable to other - LAM tests.
Item Description:Gesehen am 17.04.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1474-4457
DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30684-X