Response to: Relation of circumferential and longitudinal strain to other independent prognostic imaging markers in first time ST-elevation myocardial infarction

We highly appreciate the letter from Garg and colleagues in regard to our recent article. - However, some points need to be mentioned, which may further help with the interpretation - of our study. Firstly, we are absolutely aware of the limitations and pitfalls, when - using this method, especially...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buß, Sebastian Johannes (Author) , Giusca, Sorin (Author) , Korosoglou, Grigorios (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2016
In: International journal of cardiology
Year: 2016, Volume: 202
ISSN:1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.149
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.149
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.internationaljournalofcardiology.com/article/S0167-5273(15)30092-9/abstract
Get full text
Author Notes:Sebastian J. Buss, Sorin Giusca, Grigorios Korosoglou
Description
Summary:We highly appreciate the letter from Garg and colleagues in regard to our recent article. - However, some points need to be mentioned, which may further help with the interpretation - of our study. Firstly, we are absolutely aware of the limitations and pitfalls, when - using this method, especially for regional radial strain the reproducibility is worse - than for circumferential strain parameters. Therefore it was not the intention of - our article to suggest that the strain assessment by feature tracking imaging (FTI) - is the sole technique for the evaluation of post-infarct remodeling or the new standard - technique for myocardial deformation imaging.
Item Description:Published:July 31, 2015
Gesehen am 28.04.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.149