Do patients after reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery?

To explore whether patients after a reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery (BCS); to learn whether the presence of residual cancer in the reexcision specimen influences the probability of LR.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hennigs, André (VerfasserIn) , Fuchs, Valerie (VerfasserIn) , Sinn, Peter (VerfasserIn) , Riedel, Fabian (VerfasserIn) , Rauch, Geraldine (VerfasserIn) , Smetanay, Katharina (VerfasserIn) , Golatta, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Domschke, Christoph (VerfasserIn) , Schütz, Florian (VerfasserIn) , Schneeweiss, Andreas (VerfasserIn) , Sohn, Christof (VerfasserIn) , Heil, Jörg (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 5 January 2016
In: Annals of surgical oncology
Year: 2016, Jahrgang: 23, Heft: 6, Pages: 1831-1837
ISSN:1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:André Hennigs, Valerie Fuchs, Hans-Peter Sinn, Fabian Riedel, Geraldine Rauch, Katharina Smetanay, Michael Golatta, Christoph Domschke, Florian Schuetz, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christof Sohn, Joerg Heil
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To explore whether patients after a reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery (BCS); to learn whether the presence of residual cancer in the reexcision specimen influences the probability of LR.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 12.05.2020
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1