Cover Image

Do patients after reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery?

To explore whether patients after a reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery (BCS); to learn whether the presence of residual cancer in the reexcision specimen influences the probability of LR.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hennigs, André (Author) , Fuchs, Valerie (Author) , Sinn, Peter (Author) , Riedel, Fabian (Author) , Rauch, Geraldine (Author) , Smetanay, Katharina (Author) , Golatta, Michael (Author) , Domschke, Christoph (Author) , Schütz, Florian (Author) , Schneeweiss, Andreas (Author) , Sohn, Christof (Author) , Heil, Jörg (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 5 January 2016
In: Annals of surgical oncology
Year: 2016, Volume: 23, Issue: 6, Pages: 1831-1837
ISSN:1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1
Get full text
Author Notes:André Hennigs, Valerie Fuchs, Hans-Peter Sinn, Fabian Riedel, Geraldine Rauch, Katharina Smetanay, Michael Golatta, Christoph Domschke, Florian Schuetz, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christof Sohn, Joerg Heil
Description
Summary:To explore whether patients after a reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery (BCS); to learn whether the presence of residual cancer in the reexcision specimen influences the probability of LR.
Item Description:Gesehen am 12.05.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1

Similar Items