Do patients after reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery?

To explore whether patients after a reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery (BCS); to learn whether the presence of residual cancer in the reexcision specimen influences the probability of LR.

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Hennigs, André (Autore) , Fuchs, Valerie (Autore) , Sinn, Peter (Autore) , Riedel, Fabian (Autore) , Rauch, Geraldine (Autore) , Smetanay, Katharina (Autore) , Golatta, Michael (Autore) , Domschke, Christoph (Autore) , Schütz, Florian (Autore) , Schneeweiss, Andreas (Autore) , Sohn, Christof (Autore) , Heil, Jörg (Autore)
Natura: Article (Journal)
Lingua:inglese
Pubblicazione: 5 January 2016
In: Annals of surgical oncology
Year: 2016, Volume: 23, Fascicolo: 6, Pages: 1831-1837
ISSN:1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1
Accesso online:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1
Testo
Note sull'autore:André Hennigs, Valerie Fuchs, Hans-Peter Sinn, Fabian Riedel, Geraldine Rauch, Katharina Smetanay, Michael Golatta, Christoph Domschke, Florian Schuetz, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christof Sohn, Joerg Heil
Descrizione
Riassunto:To explore whether patients after a reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery (BCS); to learn whether the presence of residual cancer in the reexcision specimen influences the probability of LR.
Descrizione del documento:Gesehen am 12.05.2020
Descrizione fisica:Online Resource
ISSN:1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1