Do patients after reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery?
To explore whether patients after a reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery (BCS); to learn whether the presence of residual cancer in the reexcision specimen influences the probability of LR.
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Article (Journal) |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
5 January 2016
|
| In: |
Annals of surgical oncology
Year: 2016, Volume: 23, Fascicolo: 6, Pages: 1831-1837 |
| ISSN: | 1534-4681 |
| DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1 |
| Accesso online: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1 |
| Note sull'autore: | André Hennigs, Valerie Fuchs, Hans-Peter Sinn, Fabian Riedel, Geraldine Rauch, Katharina Smetanay, Michael Golatta, Christoph Domschke, Florian Schuetz, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christof Sohn, Joerg Heil |
| Riassunto: | To explore whether patients after a reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence (LR) than those after a one-step breast-conserving surgery (BCS); to learn whether the presence of residual cancer in the reexcision specimen influences the probability of LR. |
|---|---|
| Descrizione del documento: | Gesehen am 12.05.2020 |
| Descrizione fisica: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1534-4681 |
| DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1 |