IVIM-diffusion-MRI for the differentiation of solid benign and malign hypervascular liver lesions: evaluation with two different MR scanners

Purpose - Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) as the most common malign and benign liver tumors are both hypervascularized and potentially difficult to differentiate. DWI in liver MRI has been shown to be helpful in the classification of liver lesions, although with a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Klauß, Miriam (Author) , Mayer, Philipp (Author) , Maier-Hein, Klaus H. (Author) , Laun, Frederik B. (Author) , Mehrabi, Arianeb (Author) , Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich (Author) , Stieltjes, Bram (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: [2016]
In: European journal of radiology
Year: 2016, Volume: 85, Issue: 7, Pages: 1289-1294
ISSN:1872-7727
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.04.011
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.04.011
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X1630122X
Get full text
Author Notes:Miriam Klauß, Philipp Mayer, Klaus Maier-Hein, Frederik B. Laun, Arineb Mehrabi, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Bram Stieltjes
Description
Summary:Purpose - Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) as the most common malign and benign liver tumors are both hypervascularized and potentially difficult to differentiate. DWI in liver MRI has been shown to be helpful in the classification of liver lesions, although with a substantial ADC-values-overlap. First results suggest that IVIM allows for improved characterization of liver lesions. In this study we evaluated IVIM-derived parameters in HCC and FNH with two different MR-scanners. - Material and methods - 72 patients (29 FNH, 43HCC) were examined prospectively using two 1.5 T-MRI scanners (Aera/MagnetomAvanto, Siemens, Germany). Quantitative analysis of IVIM-derived parameters and ADC800-values was performed independently by two radiologists. The concordance between the reviewers was tested using a Pearson-/Spearman-correlation. The mean values for significant differences between FNHs and HCCs and between the two MR scanners were compared using a two-tailed t-test/Mann-Whitney-U test. An ROC analysis assessing the diagnostic performance of the parameters was performed. - Results - The concordance between the two f-, D- and D*-measurements were r=0.81, 0.81 and 0.84, and r=0.58 for ADC-values. D-values and ADC800-values were significantly lower in HCC compared to FNH (p<0.001), there was no significant difference for f and D*. D had the largest AUC (0.76) for the differentiation between the two entities. Most parameters were not significantly different between the two MRIs. - Conclusion - IVIM-derived D and ADC are comparable for the differentiation between HCC and FNH. Since ADC-measurement means less effort than IVIM, ADC should be used for the differentiation between the two entities. Furthermore, quantitative results obtained from different scanners match closely.
Item Description:Gesehen am 13.05.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1872-7727
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.04.011