Options to reform the European Union legislation on GMOs: post-authorization and beyond

We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. In this third of three articles, we focus on labeling and coexistence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eriksson, Dennis (Author) , Custers, René (Author) , Edvardsson Björnberg, Karin (Author) , Hansson, Sven Ove (Author) , Purnhagen, Kai (Author) , Qaim, Matin (Author) , Romeis, Jörg (Author) , Schiemann, Joachim (Author) , Schleissing, Stephan (Author) , Tosun, Jale (Author) , Visser, Richard G. F. (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 12 February 2020
In: Trends in biotechnology
Year: 2020, Volume: 38, Issue: 5, Pages: 465-467
ISSN:1879-3096
DOI:10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167779919303105
Get full text
Author Notes:Dennis Eriksson, René Custers, Karin Edvardsson Björnberg, Sven Ove Hansson, Kai Purnhagen, Matin Qaim, Jörg Romeis, Joachim Schiemann, Stephan Schleissing, Jale Tosun, and Richard G.F. Visser
Description
Summary:We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. In this third of three articles, we focus on labeling and coexistence as well as discuss the political reality and potential ways forward.
Item Description:Gesehen am 18.05.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1879-3096
DOI:10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015