Investigation of the identity of the nucleophile initiating the hydrolysis of phosphate esters catalyzed by dinuclear mimics of metallohydrolases

di-Zinc(II) complexes of the ligands 2,6-bis((bis(2-methoxyethyl)amino)methyl)-4-methylphenol (HL1), 2,6-bis(bis(hydroxyethyl)aminomethyl)-4-methylphenol (HL2) and 2,6-bis((hydroxyethyl)(methoxyethyl)-aminomethyl)-4-methylphenol (HL3) have been prepared and characterized. The three ligands differ in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brown, Joshua James (Author) , Gahan, Lawrence R. (Author) , Schöffler, Anne (Author) , Krenske, Elizabeth H. (Author) , Schenk, Gerhard (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 13 February 2016
In: Journal of inorganic biochemistry
Year: 2016, Volume: 162, Pages: 356-365
ISSN:1873-3344
DOI:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.02.008
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.02.008
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162013416300344
Get full text
Author Notes:Joshua J. Brown, Lawrence R. Gahan, Anne Schöffler, Elizabeth H. Krenske, Gerhard Schenk
Description
Summary:di-Zinc(II) complexes of the ligands 2,6-bis((bis(2-methoxyethyl)amino)methyl)-4-methylphenol (HL1), 2,6-bis(bis(hydroxyethyl)aminomethyl)-4-methylphenol (HL2) and 2,6-bis((hydroxyethyl)(methoxyethyl)-aminomethyl)-4-methylphenol (HL3) have been prepared and characterized. The three ligands differ in their donor types, having ether donors (HL1), alkoxido donors (HL2) and both ether and alkoxido donors (HL3). These differences allowed an investigation into the role of the potential nucleophiles in the hydrolysis reaction with the phosphodiester substrate bis(2,4-dinitrophenyl)phosphate (BDNPP). In addition, the di-Mg(II) complex of ligand HL2 was prepared in order to examine the potential for Mg(II) to replace Zn(II) in these biomimetic systems. Kinetically relevant pKa values for the three di-Zn(II) complexes were determined to be 7.14 and 9.21 for [Zn2(L1)(CH3COO)2](PF6), 7.90 and 10.21 for [Zn2(L2)(CH3COO)2](BPh4) and 8.43 and 10.69 for [Zn2(L3)(CH3COO)2](BPh4). At the respective pH optima the relevant catalytic parameters are kcat=5.44(0.11)×10−5s−1 (Km=5.13(0.92) mM), 2.60(0.87)×10−4s−1 (Km=5.49(1.51) mM) and 1.53(0.27)×10−4s−1 (Km=2.14(0.50) mM) for [Zn2(L1)(CH3COO)2](PF6), [Zn2(L2)(CH3COO)2](BPh4) or [Zn2(L3)(CH3COO)2](BPh4), respectively. The di-Mg(II) complex was found to be unreactive in the hydrolysis reaction with BDNPP under the conditions employed. Computational methods using the [Zn2(L2)(CH3COO)2](BPh4) complex were used to discriminate between different possible mechanistic pathways. The DFT calculations indicate that an alkoxido-mediated pathway in the complexes formed with ligands L2 or L3 is unlikely, because it induces significant distortion of the Zn2(L) unit; a direct attack by a coordinated hydroxide is preferred in each of the three systems studied here. The calculations also revealed the important role of ligand structural rigidity.
Item Description:Gesehen am 20.05.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1873-3344
DOI:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.02.008