Differential treatment effects of two anchorage systems for rapid maxillary expansion: a retrospective cephalometric study
The purpose of this study was to compare cephalometric changes resulting from treatment with two appliances for rapid maxillary expansion: (1) a strictly tooth-borne appliance and (2) a combined tooth- and bone-borne appliance.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
7 June 2016
|
| In: |
Journal of orofacial orthopedics
Year: 2016, Volume: 77, Issue: 5, Pages: 314-324 |
| ISSN: | 1615-6714 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00056-016-0037-1 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0037-1 |
| Author Notes: | Jan Hourfar, Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger, Björn Ludwig, Julia Spindler, Jörg Alexander Lisson |
| Summary: | The purpose of this study was to compare cephalometric changes resulting from treatment with two appliances for rapid maxillary expansion: (1) a strictly tooth-borne appliance and (2) a combined tooth- and bone-borne appliance. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 20.05.2020 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1615-6714 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00056-016-0037-1 |