Comparative utcomes of neoadjuvant treatment prior to total mesorectal excision and total mesorectal excision alone in selected stage II/III low and mid rectal cancer
Current guidelines advocate that all rectal cancer patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages II and III disease should be subjected to neoadjuvant therapy. However, improvements in surgical technique have resulted in single-digit local recurrence rates with surgery only.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2016
|
| In: |
Annals of surgical oncology
Year: 2016, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, Pages: 106-113 |
| ISSN: | 1534-4681 |
| DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-015-4832-5 |
| Online Access: | Resolving-System, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4832-5 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245%2Fs10434-015-4832-5 |
| Author Notes: | Yakup Kulu, Ignazio Tarantino, Adrian T. Billeter, Markus K. Diener, Thomas Schmidt, Markus W. Büchler, and Alexis Ulrich |
| Summary: | Current guidelines advocate that all rectal cancer patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages II and III disease should be subjected to neoadjuvant therapy. However, improvements in surgical technique have resulted in single-digit local recurrence rates with surgery only. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Online veröffentlicht: 25. August 2015 Gesehen am 02.06.2020 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1534-4681 |
| DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-015-4832-5 |