Buchumschlag

Are there differences between stemless and conventional stemmed shoulder prostheses in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis?

Weitere Versionen anzeigen (1)

Conventional stemmed anatomical shoulder prostheses are widely used in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The stemless shoulder prosthesis, in contrast, is a new concept, and fewer outcome studies are available. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to investigate the early functional o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Maier, Michael Wolfgang (VerfasserIn) , Lauer, Sarah (VerfasserIn) , Klotz, Matthias C. M. (VerfasserIn) , Bülhoff, Matthias (VerfasserIn) , Spranz, David Maximilian (VerfasserIn) , Zeifang, Felix (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 1 October 2015
In: BMC musculoskeletal disorders
Year: 2015, Jahrgang: 16, Heft: 1
ISSN:1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-015-0723-y
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0723-y
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Michael W. Maier, Sarah Lauer, Matthias C. Klotz, Matthias Bülhoff, David Spranz and Felix Zeifang
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Conventional stemmed anatomical shoulder prostheses are widely used in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The stemless shoulder prosthesis, in contrast, is a new concept, and fewer outcome studies are available. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to investigate the early functional outcome and postoperative proprioception of a stemless prosthesis in comparison with a standard stemmed anatomic shoulder prosthesis.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 05.06.2020
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-015-0723-y

Ähnliche Einträge