Computer-aided diagnosis from weak supervision: a benchmarking study
Supervised machine learning is a powerful tool frequently used in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) applications. The bottleneck of this technique is its demand for fine grained expert annotations, which are tedious for medical image analysis applications. Furthermore, information is typically localize...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015
|
| In: |
Computerized medical imaging and graphics
Year: 2014, Volume: 42, Pages: 44-50 |
| ISSN: | 1879-0771 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.11.010 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.11.010 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895611114001852 
|
| Author Notes: | Melih Kandemir, Fred A. Hamprecht |
| Summary: | Supervised machine learning is a powerful tool frequently used in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) applications. The bottleneck of this technique is its demand for fine grained expert annotations, which are tedious for medical image analysis applications. Furthermore, information is typically localized in diagnostic images, which makes representation of an entire image by a single feature set problematic. The multiple instance learning framework serves as a remedy to these two problems by allowing labels to be provided for groups of observations, called bags, and assuming the group label to be the maximum of the instance labels within the bag. This setup can effectively be applied to CAD by splitting a given diagnostic image into a Cartesian grid, treating each grid element (patch) as an instance by representing it with a feature set, and grouping instances belonging to the same image into a bag. We quantify the power of existing multiple instance learning methods by evaluating their performance on two distinct CAD applications: (i) Barrett's cancer diagnosis and (ii) diabetic retinopathy screening. In the experiments, mi-Graph appears as the best-performing method in bag-level prediction (i.e. diagnosis) for both of these applications that have drastically different visual characteristics. For instance-level prediction (i.e. disease localization), mi-SVM ranks as the most accurate method. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Available online 20 November 2014 Gesehen am 12.06.2020 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1879-0771 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.11.010 |