The development of our sense of self as a defense against invading thoughts: from Buddhist psychology to psychoanalysis

In interdisciplinary debates on the nature of the self, no-self accounts often refer to Buddhist psychology, arguing that the self is an illusion arising from our identification with mental content. What is often missing, however, is a developmentally, motivationally and emotionally plausible reason...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mayer, Andreas Frank (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2020
In: New ideas in psychology
Year: 2019, Volume: 58
ISSN:0732-118X
DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100775
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100775
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X1930159X
Get full text
Author Notes:Andreas Mayer
Description
Summary:In interdisciplinary debates on the nature of the self, no-self accounts often refer to Buddhist psychology, arguing that the self is an illusion arising from our identification with mental content. What is often missing, however, is a developmentally, motivationally and emotionally plausible reason why this identification happens in the first place. It is argued that directing attention to our ongoing thought activities and their effect on our mind reveals their often invasive character. This is supported by psychoanalytic accounts on the ontogenetic and phylogenetic origins of thinking. On an experiential level, invading thoughts have similarities to attacks and provoke defensive reactions. The defense mechanism described as identification with the aggressor is used as a model in order to better grasp how we deal with invading thoughts, namely, by identifying with them and thus generating a sense of self as an agent of thoughts which provides an illusion of control.
Item Description:Available online 9 December 2019
Gesehen am 13.07.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:0732-118X
DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100775