Treatment-associated fatigue in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims - Fatigue is one of the most prominent side-effects of immune checkpoint inhibition. Therefore, we assessed the risk of fatigue associated with inhibitors of the immune checkpoints. - Materials and methods - We examined data from the Medline and Google Scholar databases. We also examined origin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdel-Rahman, Omar M. (Author) , Mehrabi, Arianeb (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 20 June 2016
In: Clinical oncology
Year: 2016, Volume: 28, Issue: 10, Pages: e127-e138
ISSN:1433-2981
DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2016.06.008
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2016.06.008
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655516301261
Get full text
Author Notes:O. Abdel-Rahman, D. Helbling, J. Schmidt, U. Petrausch, A. Giryes, A. Mehrabi, O. Schöb, M. Mannhart, A. Zidan, H. Oweira
Description
Summary:Aims - Fatigue is one of the most prominent side-effects of immune checkpoint inhibition. Therefore, we assessed the risk of fatigue associated with inhibitors of the immune checkpoints. - Materials and methods - We examined data from the Medline and Google Scholar databases. We also examined original studies and review articles for cross-references. Eligible studies included randomised phase II and phase III trials of patients with cancer treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab and tremelimumab. The authors extracted relevant information on participants' characteristics, all-grade and high-grade fatigue and information on the methodology of the studies. - Results - In total, 17 trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The odds ratio for all-grade fatigue for CTLA-4 inhibitors was 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.07, 1.41; P = 0.003) and for high-grade fatigue was 1.72 (95% confidence interval 1.26, 2.33; P = 0.0005). Moreover, the odds ratio for all-grade fatigue for PD-1 inhibitors was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.62, 0.84; P < 0.0001) and for high-grade fatigue was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.23, 0.56; P < 0.00001). - Conclusions - The analysis of data showed that CTLA-4 inhibitors seem to be associated with a higher risk of all- and high-grade fatigue compared with control regimens, whereas PD-1 inhibitors seem to be associated with a lower risk of all- and high-grade fatigue compared with control regimens.
Item Description:Gesehen am 20.07.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1433-2981
DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2016.06.008