Vote buying or (political) business (cycles) as usual?

We report robust evidence of a new short-run monetary election cycle: the monthly growth rate of the money supply (M1) around elections is higher than in other months in a sample of low- and middle-income countries. We hypothesize this is related to systemic vote buying. Consistent with this, we fin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aidt, Toke (Autor) , Asatryan, Zareh (Autor) , Badalyan, Lusine (Autor) , Heinemann, Friedrich (Autor)
Formato: Article (Journal)
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: 2020
In: The review of economics and statistics
Year: 2019, Volumen: 102, Número: 3, Pages: 409-425
ISSN:0034-6535
DOI:10.1162/rest_a_00820
Acceso en línea:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00820
Enlace del recurso
Notas de Autor:Toke Aidt, Zareh Asatryan, Lusine Badalyan, and Friedrich Heinemann
Descripción
Sumario:We report robust evidence of a new short-run monetary election cycle: the monthly growth rate of the money supply (M1) around elections is higher than in other months in a sample of low- and middle-income countries. We hypothesize this is related to systemic vote buying. Consistent with this, we find no cycle in authoritarian countries and countries with strong political institutions and a pronounced cycle in elections where international election monitors reported vote buying or in close elections. Using survey data on daily consumer expenditures, we show that within-household consumption of food increases in the days before elections.
Notas:Posted online July 02, 2020
Gesehen am 12.08.2020
Descripción Física:Online Resource
ISSN:0034-6535
DOI:10.1162/rest_a_00820