Blinded sample size re-estimation in crossover bioequivalence trials

In drug development, bioequivalence studies are used to indirectly demonstrate clinical equivalence of a test formulation and a reference formulation of a specific drug by establishing their equivalence in bioavailability. These studies are typically run as crossover studies. In the planning phase o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Golkowski, Daniel (Author) , Friede, Tim (Author) , Kieser, Meinhard (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 9 April 2014
In: Pharmaceutical statistics
Year: 2014, Volume: 13, Issue: 3, Pages: 157-162
ISSN:1539-1612
DOI:10.1002/pst.1617
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1617
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pst.1617
Get full text
Author Notes:Daniel Golkowski, Tim Friede, and Meinhard Kieser
Description
Summary:In drug development, bioequivalence studies are used to indirectly demonstrate clinical equivalence of a test formulation and a reference formulation of a specific drug by establishing their equivalence in bioavailability. These studies are typically run as crossover studies. In the planning phase of such trials, investigators and sponsors are often faced with a high variability in the coefficients of variation of the typical pharmacokinetic endpoints such as the area under the concentration curve or the maximum plasma concentration. Adaptive designs have recently been considered to deal with this uncertainty by adjusting the sample size based on the accumulating data. Because regulators generally favor sample size re-estimation procedures that maintain the blinding of the treatment allocations throughout the trial, we propose in this paper a blinded sample size re-estimation strategy and investigate its error rates. We show that the procedure, although blinded, can lead to some inflation of the type I error rate. In the context of an example, we demonstrate how this inflation of the significance level can be adjusted for to achieve control of the type I error rate at a pre-specified level. Furthermore, some refinements of the re-estimation procedure are proposed to improve the power properties, in particular in scenarios with small sample sizes. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Item Description:Gesehen am 02.09.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1539-1612
DOI:10.1002/pst.1617