Promises and opportunity cost

This paper experimentally investigates the hypothesis that promise-keeping behavior is affected by the opportunities that a counterpart foregoes by relying on the promise. We present two motivational mechanisms that could drive such an effect. One is that people dislike causing harm through a promis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sengupta, Arjun (Author) , Vanberg, Christoph (Author)
Format: Book/Monograph Working Paper
Language:English
Published: Heidelberg Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg October 2020
Series:Discussion paper series / University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics no. 692
In: Discussion paper series (no. 692)

DOI:10.11588/heidok.00028980
Subjects:
Online Access:Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-289801
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00028980
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/28980
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/235015
Get full text
Author Notes:Arjun Sengupta, Christoph Vanberg
Description
Summary:This paper experimentally investigates the hypothesis that promise-keeping behavior is affected by the opportunities that a counterpart foregoes by relying on the promise. We present two motivational mechanisms that could drive such an effect. One is that people dislike causing harm through a promise, and the natural way to measure such harm is to take into account what the counterpart would have received had she not relied on the promise. The other is that people may dislike causing regret in another person. We test these ideas in the context of an experimental trust game. The main treatment variable is the payoff that the first mover forgoes if he “trusts”. Consistent with our main hypothesis, we find that an increase in this foregone payoff increases promise-keeping behavior. The experiment is designed to rule out alternative explanations for such an effect. Our evidence suggests that the mechanism driving the effect may involve an aversion to causing regret in others.
Physical Description:Online Resource
DOI:10.11588/heidok.00028980