On the robustness of the association between Honesty-Humility and dishonest behavior for varying incentives

Previous research consistently showed a negative link between Honesty-Humility (HH) and dishonest behavior. However, most prior research neglected the influence of situational factors and their potential interaction with HH. In two incentivized experiments (N = 322, N = 552), we thus tested whether...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Klein, Sina (VerfasserIn) , Thielmann, Isabel (VerfasserIn) , Hilbig, Benjamin E. (VerfasserIn) , Heck, Daniel W. (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 5 August 2020
In: Journal of research in personality
Year: 2020, Jahrgang: 88
ISSN:0092-6566
DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104006
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104006
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656620300945
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Sina A. Klein, Isabel Thielmann, Benjamin E. Hilbig, Daniel W. Heck
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Previous research consistently showed a negative link between Honesty-Humility (HH) and dishonest behavior. However, most prior research neglected the influence of situational factors and their potential interaction with HH. In two incentivized experiments (N = 322, N = 552), we thus tested whether the (subjective) utility of incentives moderates the HH-dishonesty link. Replicating prior evidence, HH showed a consistent negative link to dishonesty. However, the utility of incentives did not moderate this association, neither when manipulated through incentive size (BF01 = 5.7) nor when manipulated through gain versus loss framing (BF01 = 20.4). These results demonstrate the robustness of the HH-dishonesty link.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 05.11.2020
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:0092-6566
DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104006