Bearing thickness is not a predictive factor for damage and penetration in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrieval analysis
The medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) shows good survivorship, as well as clinical results. Aseptic loosening, however, remains one of the main reasons for revision and polyethylene debris is known to cause aseptic loosening. The role of bearing thickness in total as well as un...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
15 October 2020
|
| In: |
Materials
Year: 2020, Volume: 13, Issue: 20 |
| ISSN: | 1996-1944 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/ma13204589 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204589 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/20/4589 
|
| Author Notes: | Johannes Adrian Eckert, Ulrike Mueller, Tilman Walker, Martin Schwarze, Sebastian Jaeger andJan Philippe Kretzer |
| Summary: | The medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) shows good survivorship, as well as clinical results. Aseptic loosening, however, remains one of the main reasons for revision and polyethylene debris is known to cause aseptic loosening. The role of bearing thickness in total as well as unicondylar knee arthroplasty has been the subject of controversial discussions, especially the longevity of lower thickness bearings in total knee arthroplasty was questioned. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of bearing thickness on time to revision, damage pattern, penetration, and volumetric material loss. A cohort of 47 consecutively retrieved medial OUKA bearings was analyzed with conventional direct light microscopy applying the Hood damage analysis, as well as measuring the penetration depth. In this retrieval cohort, a difference on survival time, damage, penetration, as well as volumetric material loss could not be seen. We conclude that low as well as high thickness bearings can safely be used in OUKA without any relevant differences in terms of wear and damage. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 23.11.2020 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1996-1944 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/ma13204589 |