Application and comparison of supervised learning strategies to classify polarity of epithelial cell spheroids in 3D culture

3D culture systems that allow generation of monolayered epithelial cell spheroids are widely used to study epithelial function in vitro. Epithelial spheroid formation is applied to address cellular consequences of (mono)-genetic disorders, i.e. ciliopathies, in toxicity testing, or to develop treatm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sötje, Birga (Author) , Füllekrug, Joachim (Author) , Haffner, Dieter (Author) , Ziegler, Wolfgang H. (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 27 March 2020
In: Frontiers in genetics
Year: 2020, Volume: 11
ISSN:1664-8021
DOI:10.3389/fgene.2020.00248
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00248
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.00248/full
Get full text
Author Notes:Birga Soetje, Joachim Fuellekrug, Dieter Haffner and Wolfgang H. Ziegler
Description
Summary:3D culture systems that allow generation of monolayered epithelial cell spheroids are widely used to study epithelial function in vitro. Epithelial spheroid formation is applied to address cellular consequences of (mono)-genetic disorders, i.e. ciliopathies, in toxicity testing, or to develop treatment options aimed to restore proper epithelial cell characteristics and function. With the potential of a high-throughput method, the main obstacle to efficient application of the spheroid formation assay so far is the laborious, time-consuming and bias-prone analysis of spheroid images by individuals. Hundredths of multidimensional fluorescence images are blinded, rated by 3 persons, and subsequently, differences in ratings are compared and discussed. Here, we apply supervised learning and compare strategies based on machine learning versus deep learning. While deep learning approaches can directly process raw image data, machine learning requires transformed data of features extracted from fluorescence images. We verify the accuracy of both strategies on a validation dataset, analyse an experimental dataset, and observe that different strategies can be very accurate. Deep learning, however, is less sensitive to overfitting and experimental batch-to-batch variations thus providing a rather powerful and easily adjustable classification tool.
Item Description:Gesehen am 26.11.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1664-8021
DOI:10.3389/fgene.2020.00248