Primary osteoblasts, osteoblast precursor cells or osteoblast‐like cell lines: which human cell types are (most) suitable for characterizing 45S5‐bioactive glass?
The question how bioactive glasses (BGs) influence the viability and osteogenic differentiation of human osteogenic cells has already been addressed by several studies. However, a literature review revealed great differences in the type of cells used for these experiments.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2020
|
| In: |
Journal of biomedical materials research
Year: 2019, Volume: 108, Issue: 3, Pages: 663-674 |
| ISSN: | 1552-4965 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jbm.a.36846 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36846 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.36846 
|
| Author Notes: | Sebastian Wilkesmann, Jörg Fellenberg, Qaisar Nawaz, Bruno Reible, Arash Moghaddam, Aldo R. Boccaccini, Fabian Westhauser |
| Summary: | The question how bioactive glasses (BGs) influence the viability and osteogenic differentiation of human osteogenic cells has already been addressed by several studies. However, a literature review revealed great differences in the type of cells used for these experiments. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | First published: 20 November 2019 Gesehen am 19.01.2021 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1552-4965 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jbm.a.36846 |