Safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer in routine clinical practice: a patterns-of-care and outcome analysis

Introduction: - To evaluate safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a patterns-of-care and patterns-of-outcome analysis. - Methods: - The working group “Extracranial Stereotactic Radiotherapy” of the German Society for Radiation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guckenberger, Matthias (Author) , Sterzing, Florian (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 20 November 2015
In: Journal of thoracic oncology
Year: 2013, Volume: 8, Issue: 8, Pages: 1050-1058
ISSN:1556-1380
DOI:10.1097/JTO.0b013e318293dc45
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e318293dc45
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556086415334456
Get full text
Author Notes:Matthias Guckenberger, MD, Michael Allgäuer, MD, Steffen Appold, MD, Karin Dieckmann, MD, Iris Ernst, MD, Ute Ganswindt, MD, Richard Holy, MD, Ursula Nestle, MD, Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel, MD, Sabine Semrau, MD, Florian Sterzing, MD, Andrea Wittig, MD, and Nicolaus Andratschke, MD
Description
Summary:Introduction: - To evaluate safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a patterns-of-care and patterns-of-outcome analysis. - Methods: - The working group “Extracranial Stereotactic Radiotherapy” of the German Society for Radiation Oncology performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of practice and outcome after SBRT for stage I NSCLC. Sixteen German and Austrian centers with experience in pulmonary SBRT were asked to participate. - Results: - Data of 582 patients treated at 13 institutions between 1998 and 2011 were collected; all institutions, except one, were academic hospitals. A time trend to more advanced radiotherapy technologies and escalated irradiation doses was observed, but patient characteristics (age, performance status, pulmonary function) remained stable over time. Interinstitutional variability was substantial in all treatment characteristics but not in patient characteristics. After an average follow-up of 21 months, 3-year freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival (OS) were 79.6% and 47.1%, respectively. The biological effective dose was the most significant factor influencing FFLP and OS: after more than 106 Gy biological effective dose as planning target volume encompassing dose (N = 164), 3-year FFLP and OS were 92.5% and 62.2%, respectively. No evidence of a learning curve or improvement of results with larger SBRT experience and implementation of new radiotherapy technologies was observed. - Conclusion: - SBRT for stage I NSCLC was safe and effective in this multi-institutional, academic environment, despite considerable interinstitutional variability and time trends in SBRT practice. Radiotherapy dose was identified as a major treatment factor influencing local tumor control and OS.
Item Description:Gesehen am 16.02.2021
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1556-1380
DOI:10.1097/JTO.0b013e318293dc45