Aristotelismus und Averroismus in der politischen Theorie bei Marsilius von Padua und Wilhelm von Ockham

The paper is aiming to look at the importance of the Arabian political philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rušd) for the reception of the political philosophy of the Greek philosopher Aristotle in the Latin West by analyzing the exemple of two maior medieval authors (Marsiglio of Padua and William Ockham) fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miethke, Jürgen (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2019
In: Revista portuguesa de filosofia
Year: 2019, Volume: 75, Issue: 3, Pages: 1739-1762
ISSN:2183-461X
DOI:10.17990/RPF/2019_75_3_1739
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26796771
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2019_75_3_1739
Get full text
Author Notes:Jürgen Miethke
Description
Summary:The paper is aiming to look at the importance of the Arabian political philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rušd) for the reception of the political philosophy of the Greek philosopher Aristotle in the Latin West by analyzing the exemple of two maior medieval authors (Marsiglio of Padua and William Ockham) for “averroistic” doctrines, in order to check the often discussed so called “Political Averroism” in the medieval Latin political philosophy. As result there seems to emerge the insight, that “Political Averroism” is only a “historiographical myth”, for Marsiglio is showing only some minor points of reference to averroistic topics, whereas Ockham seems free of clear relationship to “Averroism”.
Item Description:Gesehen am 03.02.2021
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2183-461X
DOI:10.17990/RPF/2019_75_3_1739