In vitro drug sensitivity predicts response and survival after individualized sensitivity-directed chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a multicenter phase II trial of the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group

Purpose:In vitro sensitivity assays are promising tools to predict the individual outcome of different chemotherapy regimens. However, a direct association between in vitro and in vivo chemosensitivity has to be shown by clinical studies. This multicenter phase II trial was aimed to investigate the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ugurel, Selma (Author) , Schadendorf, Dirk (Author) , Figl, Adina (Author) , Rittgen, Werner (Author) , Delorme, Stefan (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: September 25, 2006
In: Clinical cancer research
Year: 2006, Volume: 12, Issue: 18, Pages: 5454-5463
ISSN:1557-3265
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2763
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2763
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/12/18/5454
Get full text
Author Notes:Selma Ugurel, Dirk Schadendorf, Claudia Pföhler, Karsten Neuber, Adina Thoelke, Jens Ulrich, Axel Hauschild, Konstanze Spieth, Martin Kaatz, Werner Rittgen, Stefan Delorme, Wolfgang Tilgen, and Uwe Reinhold
Description
Summary:Purpose:In vitro sensitivity assays are promising tools to predict the individual outcome of different chemotherapy regimens. However, a direct association between in vitro and in vivo chemosensitivity has to be shown by clinical studies. This multicenter phase II trial was aimed to investigate the efficacy of a sensitivity-directed, first-line chemotherapy in metastasized melanoma patients, and to prove an association between in vitro sensitivity and therapy outcome. - Patients and Methods: The primary study end point was objective response; secondary end points were safety, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Viable tumor cells obtained from metastatic lesions were tested for chemosensitivity to seven single drugs and five drug combinations using an ATP-based luminescence viability assay. - Results: Out of 82 recruited patients (intention-to-treat), 57 received assay-directed chemotherapy and 53 were evaluable for all study end points (per protocol). The drug combinations used were gemcitabine + treosulfan, paclitaxel + cisplatin, paclitaxel + doxorubicin, and gemcitabine + cisplatin. The per protocol population could be divided into 22 (42%) chemosensitive and 31 (58%) chemoresistant patients by an arbitrary chemosensitivity index. Objective response was 36.4% in chemosensitive patients compared with 16.1% in chemoresistant patients (P = 0.114); progression arrest (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was 59.1% versus 22.6% (P = 0.01). Chemosensitive patients showed an increased overall survival of 14.6 months compared with 7.4 months in chemoresistant patients (P = 0.041). - Conclusion:In vitro chemosensitivity testing may be worthy of further exploration to see if it could be a useful tool to predict the outcome of melanoma patients treated with a sensitivity-directed chemotherapy. Therefore, these preliminary results will be evaluated by a planned phase III trial using a randomized, standard-regimen controlled setting.
Item Description:Gesehen am 05.02.2021
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1557-3265
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2763