Robustness and idealizations in agent-based models of scientific interaction
The article presents an agent-based model (ABM) of scientific interaction aimed at examining how different degrees of connectedness of scientists impact their efficiency in knowledge acquisition. The model is built on the basis of Zollman’s ([2010]) ABM by changing some of its idealizing assumptions...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2020
|
| In: |
The British journal for the philosophy of science
Year: 2020, Volume: 71, Issue: 4, Pages: 1411-1437 |
| ISSN: | 1464-3537 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/bjps/axy039 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy039 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1093/bjps/axy039 
|
| Author Notes: | Daniel Frey and Dunja Šešelja |
| Summary: | The article presents an agent-based model (ABM) of scientific interaction aimed at examining how different degrees of connectedness of scientists impact their efficiency in knowledge acquisition. The model is built on the basis of Zollman’s ([2010]) ABM by changing some of its idealizing assumptions that concern the representation of the central notions underlying the model: epistemic success of the rivalling scientific theories, scientific interaction and the assessment in view of which scientists choose theories to work on. Our results suggest that whether and to what extent the degree of connectedness of a scientific community impacts its efficiency is a highly context-dependent matter since different conditions deem strikingly different results. More generally, we argue that simplicity of ABMs may come at a price: the requirement to run extensive robustness analysis before we can specify the adequate target phenomenon of the model.1 1. Introduction2. Zollman's 2010 Model3. Static versus Dynamic Epistemic Success 3.1. Introducing the notion of dynamic epistemic success3.2. Implementation and results for the basic setup4. Critical Interaction 4.1. Introducing critique4.2. Implementation and results5. Inertia of Inquiry 5.1. Introducing rational inertia5.2. Implementation and results6. Threshold Below Which Theories Are Equally Promising 6.1. An inquiry that is even more difficult6.2. Implementation and results7. Discussion8. Conclusion |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 08.02.2021 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1464-3537 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/bjps/axy039 |