Descriptivism without quotation

Current descriptivist accounts of proper names entail two claims: (i) that the expressions we know as different proper names are the bearers of different meanings and (ii) that the descriptions corresponding to these meanings contain quotations of the expressions whose meanings they are taken to be....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Franken, Dirk (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: [2020]
In: Topoi
Year: 2018, Volume: 39, Issue: 2, Pages: 367-379
ISSN:1572-8749
DOI:10.1007/s11245-018-9555-3
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9555-3
Get full text
Author Notes:Dirk Franken
Description
Summary:Current descriptivist accounts of proper names entail two claims: (i) that the expressions we know as different proper names are the bearers of different meanings and (ii) that the descriptions corresponding to these meanings contain quotations of the expressions whose meanings they are taken to be. While (ii) is the source of a number of intractable problems, descriptivists feel committed to it because it is the only available option to adhere to (i), which they use to take as a matter of course. In the present paper I will bring up for discussion a, to my knowledge, new descriptivist account, inter-nominal descriptivism, which avoids the commitment to (ii) by rejecting (i). According to this account, all tokens of the expressions known as different proper names express the same descriptive mode of presentation and this descriptive mode of presentation is akin to the character of an indexical. I will try to show that, contrary to first appearance, this idea can be developed in a consistent and plausible manner.
Item Description:Published online: 30 March 2018
Gesehen am 07.04.2021
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1572-8749
DOI:10.1007/s11245-018-9555-3