Ernst Ferdinand Sauerbruch and his ambiguous role in the period of National Socialism
The role of German physicians under National Socialism is highly controversial. We show that Ferdinand Sauerbruch, one of twentieth century's most outstanding surgeons and chair of surgery at Berlin's Charité from 1927 to 1949, openly supported National Socialism in his public statements...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2006
|
| In: |
Annals of surgery
Year: 2006, Jahrgang: 244, Heft: 2, Pages: 315-321 |
| ISSN: | 1528-1140 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/01.sla.0000218191.68016.cf |
| Online-Zugang: | lizenzpflichtig
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Marc Dewey, Udo Schagen, Wolfgang U. Eckart and Eva Schönenberger |
| Zusammenfassung: | The role of German physicians under National Socialism is highly controversial. We show that Ferdinand Sauerbruch, one of twentieth century's most outstanding surgeons and chair of surgery at Berlin's Charité from 1927 to 1949, openly supported National Socialism in his public statements and in his position as head of the medical section of the Reich Research Council. He was appointed state councilor and received the Knight's Cross of the War Merit Cross by the National Socialists. But Sauerbruch also supported victims of Nazi persecution, attempted to use his influence to put a stop to the "Euthanasia Program T4," and in private expressed his criticism of National Socialists. The ambiguous stance of Ferdinand Sauerbruch is probably more typical of the role physicians played during National Socialism than the well-known black-and-white cases. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 10.05.2021 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1528-1140 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/01.sla.0000218191.68016.cf |