Nephrometry scores: can preoperative assessment of sectional imaging really mirror intraoperative renal tumor anatomy?

Introduction: To compare RENAL, preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification, and Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) scores with the respective intraoperative findings and surgeon’s assessment in predicting surgical outcome of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Egen, Luisa (Author) , Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich (Author) , Riffel, Philipp (Author) , Honeck, Patrick (Author) , Kriegmair, Maximilian (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: Urologia internationalis
Year: 2021, Volume: 105, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 108-117
ISSN:1423-0399
DOI:10.1159/000510684
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1159/000510684
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/510684
Get full text
Author Notes:Luisa Egen, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Philipp Riffel, Patrick Honeck, Maximilian C. Kriegmair
Description
Summary:Introduction: To compare RENAL, preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification, and Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) scores with the respective intraoperative findings and surgeon’s assessment in predicting surgical outcome of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Methods: Data of 150 eligible patients treated at the University Medical Center Mannheim between 2016 and 2018 were analyzed. Tumors were radiologically and intraoperatively assessed by PADUA, RENAL, and MAP scores and surgeon’s assessment. Correlations and regression models were created to predict ischemia time (IT), major complications, and Trifecta (negative surgical margin, IT < 25 min, and absence of major complications). Results: There were strong correlations between radiological and intraoperative RENAL (r = 0.68; p < 0.001) and PADUA scores (r = 0.72; p < 0.001). Radiological RENAL, PADUA, and MAP scores and surgeon’s assessment were independent predictors of Trifecta (OR = 0.71, p = 0.015; OR = 0.77, p = 0.035; OR = 0.65, p = 0.012; OR = 0.40, p = 0.005, respectively). IT showed significant associations with radiological RENAL, PADUA, and surgeon’s assessment (OR = 1.41, p = 0.033; OR = 1.34, p = 0.044; OR = 3.04, p = 0.003, respectively). MAP score proved as only independent predictor of major complications (OR = 2.12, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Radiologically and intraoperatively assessed scores correlated well with each other. Intraoperative nephrometry did not outperform radiological scores in predicting outcome confirming the value of the existing systems. MAP score correlates well with surgeon’s assessment of perirenal fat and major complications underlining the importance of perirenal fat characteristics.
Item Description:Gesehen am 18.06.2021
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1423-0399
DOI:10.1159/000510684