Reasoning about others' reasoning

Are people more likely to engage in critical thinking when assessing others' reasoning? And does this reasoning enhancement reflect their belief that others are more likely to be biased than themselves (the bias blind spot, BBS)? In three studies, participants who displayed BBS were better able...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Mata, André (VerfasserIn) , Fiedler, Klaus (VerfasserIn) , Ferreira, Mário B. (VerfasserIn) , Almeida, Tiago (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 27 January 2013
In: Journal of experimental social psychology
Year: 2013, Jahrgang: 49, Heft: 3, Pages: 486-491
ISSN:0022-1031
DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.010
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.010
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103113000279
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:André Mata, Klaus Fiedler, Mário B. Ferreira, Tiago Almeida
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Are people more likely to engage in critical thinking when assessing others' reasoning? And does this reasoning enhancement reflect their belief that others are more likely to be biased than themselves (the bias blind spot, BBS)? In three studies, participants who displayed BBS were better able to detect reasoning biases and performed better in reasoning problems when they were asked to examine responses that were said to come from other people than when those same responses were not attributed to other people. Participants who did not display BBS tended to do the opposite. This pattern was found to result from BBS participants engaging in more deliberate thinking when examining the responses of other people than when those answers are not given a social context (Study 2). Moreover, the better or worse performance that resulted from reasoning about others' reasoning transferred to subsequent unrelated problems (Study 3).
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 25.06.2021
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:0022-1031
DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.010