Cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis vs. abbreviated breast MRI for screening women with intermediate risk of breast cancer: how low-cost must MRI be?

Background: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) offer superior diagnostic performance compared to conventional mammography in screening women with intermediate risk of breast cancer due to dense breast tissue. The aim of this model-based economic evaluation was to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Tollens, Fabian (VerfasserIn) , Baltzer, Pascal Andreas Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Dietzel, Matthias (VerfasserIn) , Rübenthaler, Johannes (VerfasserIn) , Froelich, Matthias F. (VerfasserIn) , Kaiser, Clemens G. (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 12 March 2021
In: Cancers
Year: 2021, Jahrgang: 13, Heft: 6, Pages: 1-14
ISSN:2072-6694
DOI:10.3390/cancers13061241
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061241
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/6/1241
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Fabian Tollens, Pascal A.T. Baltzer, Matthias Dietzel, Johannes Rübenthaler, Matthias F. Froelich and Clemens G. Kaiser
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) offer superior diagnostic performance compared to conventional mammography in screening women with intermediate risk of breast cancer due to dense breast tissue. The aim of this model-based economic evaluation was to analyze whether AB-MRI is cost-effective in this cohort compared to DBT. Methods: Decision analysis and Markov simulations were used to model the cumulative costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a time horizon of 30 years. Model input parameters were adopted from recent literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were applied to test the stability of the model. Results: In the base-case scenario, the costs of an AB-MRI examination were defined to equal the costs of a full protocol acquisition. Two-yearly screening of women with dense breasts resulted in cumulative discounted costs of $8798 and $9505 for DBT and AB-MRI, and cumulative discounted effects of 19.23 and 19.27 QALYs, respectively, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $20,807 per QALY gained in the base-case scenario. By reducing the cost of an AB-MRI examination below a threshold of $241 in sensitivity analyses, AB-MRI would become cost-saving compared to DBT. Conclusion: In comparison to DBT, AB-MRI can be considered cost-effective up to a price per examination of $593 in screening patients at intermediate risk of breast cancer.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 20.07.2021
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:2072-6694
DOI:10.3390/cancers13061241