Explaining arguments with background knowledge
Most information we consume as a society is obtained over the Web. News - often from questionable sources - are spread online, as are election campaigns; calls for (collective) action spread with unforeseen speed and intensity. All such actions have argumentation at their core, and the conveyed cont...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
06 July 2020
|
| In: |
Datenbank-Spektrum
Year: 2020, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Pages: 131-141 |
| ISSN: | 1610-1995 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s13222-020-00348-6 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-020-00348-6
|
| Author Notes: | Maria Becker, Ioana Hulpuş, Juri Opitz, Debjit Paul, Jonathan Kobbe, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Anette Frank |
| Summary: | Most information we consume as a society is obtained over the Web. News - often from questionable sources - are spread online, as are election campaigns; calls for (collective) action spread with unforeseen speed and intensity. All such actions have argumentation at their core, and the conveyed content is often strategically selected or rhetorically framed. The responsibility of critical analysis of arguments is thus tacitly transferred to the content consumer who is often not prepared for the task, nor aware of the responsibility. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 12.08.2021 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1610-1995 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s13222-020-00348-6 |