Consideration of eyeball length and prismatic side-effects of spectacle lenses in strabismus surgery: a randomised, double-blind interventional study
Potential sources of error in dosage planning in strabismus surgery are (a) prismatic side-effects of spectacle lenses when measuring the preoperative angle with the alternating prism cover test and (b) a potential influence of eye ball axial length on dose response. As both errors take effect in op...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
29 April 2020
|
| In: |
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology
Year: 2020, Volume: 258, Issue: 6, Pages: 1319-1326 |
| ISSN: | 1435-702X |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00417-020-04690-z |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04690-z
|
| Author Notes: | Flemming Beisse, Matthias Koch, Lorenz Uhlmann, Christina Beisse |
| Summary: | Potential sources of error in dosage planning in strabismus surgery are (a) prismatic side-effects of spectacle lenses when measuring the preoperative angle with the alternating prism cover test and (b) a potential influence of eye ball axial length on dose response. As both errors take effect in opposite directions, many strabismus surgeons set aside their consideration. This study investigates whether considering both factors for dosage planning yields better operative results. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 09.09.2021 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1435-702X |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00417-020-04690-z |