A comparison of Prx- and OxyR-based H2O2 probes expressed in S. cerevisiae
Genetically encoded fluorescent H2O2 probes continue to advance the field of redox biology. Here, we compare the previously established peroxiredoxin-based H2O2 probe roGFP2-Tsa2ΔCR with the newly described OxyR-based H2O2 probe HyPer7, using yeast as the model system. Although not as sensitive as r...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
June 9, 2021
|
| In: |
The journal of biological chemistry
Year: 2021, Jahrgang: 297, Heft: 1, Pages: 1-8 |
| ISSN: | 1083-351X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100866 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100866 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021925821006669 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Paraskevi Kritsiligkou, Tzu Keng Shen, and Tobias P. Dick |
| Zusammenfassung: | Genetically encoded fluorescent H2O2 probes continue to advance the field of redox biology. Here, we compare the previously established peroxiredoxin-based H2O2 probe roGFP2-Tsa2ΔCR with the newly described OxyR-based H2O2 probe HyPer7, using yeast as the model system. Although not as sensitive as roGFP2-Tsa2ΔCR, HyPer7 is much improved relative to earlier HyPer versions, most notably by ratiometric pH stability. The most striking difference between the two probes is the dynamics of intracellular probe reduction. HyPer7 is rapidly reduced, predominantly by the thioredoxin system, whereas roGFP2-Tsa2ΔCR is reduced more slowly, predominantly by the glutathione system. We discuss the pros and cons of each probe and suggest that future side-by-side measurements with both probes may provide information on the relative activity of the two major cellular reducing systems. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 24.09.2021 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1083-351X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100866 |