Spatial reading: evaluative frameworks and the making of literary authority

This essay uses Charles Taylor’s theory of evaluative frameworks to solve a problem that has challenged literary theory and historiography for some time: how do we square the tension between the private uses and the public authority of reading? Taylor’s notion of strong value brings out literature’s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Leypoldt, Günter (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2021
In: American journal of cultural sociology
Year: 2021, Jahrgang: 9, Heft: 2, Pages: 150-176
ISSN:2049-7121
DOI:10.1057/s41290-020-00107-w
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00107-w
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Günter Leypoldt
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This essay uses Charles Taylor’s theory of evaluative frameworks to solve a problem that has challenged literary theory and historiography for some time: how do we square the tension between the private uses and the public authority of reading? Taylor’s notion of strong value brings out literature’s often-overlooked similarities with religious-moral or civil-sacred domains, while his concept of weak value helps us to understand more mundane moods of purpose-rational reading. Combining the concept of evaluative frameworks with a socio-institutional account of literary authority, this essay sketches an alternative history of reading, with a focus on the shifting authority of “spatial reading” (defined as attention to formal and intertextual depth). Looking at developments from the 1780s to the present, I will show how the distinction between spatial and flat reading emerges in the eighteenth century, is transformed by the modernist institutionalization of high- and middlebrow notions of spatial form, and continues to provoke tensions between the civil sphere and the literary-artistic field (as the recent scandal around Peter Handke’s Nobel Prize attests).
Beschreibung:Published online: 28 July 2020
Gesehen am 04.10.2021
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:2049-7121
DOI:10.1057/s41290-020-00107-w